Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Emma, Lady Hamilton, by George Romney, National Portrait Gallery, Accession number NPG 4448
Oppose The colors have been modified after FP labeling, this FP argument is not very rigorous. It is not possible in the state of the scope to give a label VI because there are many portraits of this lady, and this one who is far from the best can not represent them all. It would be good to reduce the scope by giving the place of exposure but in this case it will not be enough because there are two tables I suggest to also give the inventory number.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Color is an anecdote. There is only one problem: There are several different tables that can correspond to this scope, hence the need to characterize the one we are talking about by the place of exhibition and in this case by the number inventory that must be added to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
