Oppose This image is fine as a QI where photographic and artistic qualities are paramount, but when it comes to a VI, the criteria is are totally different - see here for a full explanation in English or Commons:Valued images/pt for a full explanation in Portuguese (I believe that the contributor is Brazilian). The scope is far too specific - it is tuned to the image rather than the image being the best example of the scope. I think that the scope "snub dodecahedra" is sufficient and that both this image and this image better illustrate what a snub dodecahedron is. Furthermore, since the snub dodecahedron has five-fold symmetry, showing 24 rotations is over-kill. It would be sufficient to show 0°, 18°, 36°, 54° and 72° only.Martinvl (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
