Commons:Valued image candidates/Copacabana, Bolivia.jpg

Copacabana, Bolivia.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Christopher Crouzet (talk) on 2014-05-04 17:41 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Copacabana, Bolivia
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Warning: the image is not in the gallery announced. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC) I'm sorry but I'm new here and am not sure what this warning means despite of having read carefully the guidelines? The only mention to galleries that I've found says “Images may optionally be added to any relevant content-related gallery”. As such I thought this wouldn't a problem as soon as the image was scoped and categorized properly. Should I add the picture over there? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copacabana,_Bolivia#Gallery --Christopher Crouzet (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Yes, simply put it in the gallery. But the galleryfrom the category. I did it. Click on the scope you'll see that your image is visible.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Aaaah, understood, thanks! --Christopher Crouzet (talk) 13:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC)  Support Best in scope. FYI, you should use a lower ISO (ISO 100) for such a picture, and smaller aperture (f11). Yann (talk) 15:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks! I wish I could have done that but I've been using the built-in panoramic mode from my camera here, meaning that I had to move it around to take all the required photos fir the camera to do the processing in real time. The priority had to be a high enough speed if I didn't want the photos to be blurred by the motion, and with the low light I was constrained to select those aperture and ISO values. Everything gets more difficult without a tripod! --Christopher Crouzet (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)