@Archaeodontosaurus: Sorry to be ignorant, but I'm not quite sure what you mean. There is an orientation parameter in the nomination, but I don't know what I would change that to if not landscape. Assuming you mean adding the perspective of the camera in relation to the subject to the scope, I'll go ahead and do that. I would have presumed, however, that we would start with one valued image of a subject, and then add others only when the issue arises? — Rhododendritestalk | 07:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
More than the scope is accurate, there will be less conflict. You learn quickly and is a pleasure to guide new competitors. Now you can do photography on the other side --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
