temporary oppose It's not geotagged. Furthermore, I think a schema would be more valuable, the picture itself doesn't tell me much about what a torque converter does and how it works. In the absence of schema it is probably the most valuable picture of the scope (crit. 1), but I'm not sure it illustrates the scope well (crit. 3). I guess I'd go for a neutral when it is geotagged. --Eusebius (talk) 13:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I thought it was a museum. Anyway, if it does not threaten the privacy of anyone, it does no harm to geotag it I guess? And maybe specify on the image page in what exhibition the picture was taken. --Eusebius (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is already specified at which exhibition the picture was taken: at the BAUMA 2007. I will add a geotag nevertheless. You're right, it does no harm. --Aconcagua (talk) 12:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Changing my vote to neutral. Technical criteria ok, still unsure about the proper illustration of the scope (crit. 3). --Eusebius (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a good photograph but it doesn't show how a Torque converter works. So also for me criterion 3 is not fulfilled. Lycaon (talk) 09:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
