It is an artistic illustration, an artist's impression with an apparent intention to depict it realistically, and the info on the creator at the source is "NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab"; more info here. --Prototyperspective (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be more specific, there is no way this would be best in scope in a scope of "Earth" (and look at any other nomination in edit mode to see how the term "Category" is hidden). If you think Category:Early Earth in art is the best category for this image, connect your description of what we're looking at to that category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was leaving it open to people commenting here in which scope it fits better. So I guess the latter one would be better.
(I think it's quite clearly the best surface-level image of early Earth in the Commons and I thought at least one surface-level image of early Earth would be valued in the former scope but I also see how it could be better and/or shouldn't be the only image of that kind in the former scope.) Prototyperspective (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination will run out of time, although you could subsequently choose to renominate the photo in one scope. But why not choose a scope now? If you want to nominate a photo in two scopes, you need to do so in two separate nominations, not at the same time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
