Oppose - If I've understood the term "dissection" correctly as a non-specialist, I believe the other two photos in the category are clearer, because this just looks like shifting abstract shapes within a square (or rectangle) and a hexagon, whereas in the others, the shape of the overall figure changes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek that's the problem with this VIC, non specialists trying to figure it out what's the "best", should be just an evaluation if this have a high value education or not, not what is best... and for what reason we need to find the best?[...]
But: "A dissection puzzle, also called a transformation puzzle or Richter Puzzle, is a tiling puzzle where a set of pieces can be assembled in different ways to produce two or more distinct geometric shapes. The creation of new dissection puzzles is also considered to be a type of dissection puzzle. Puzzles may include various restraints, such as hinged pieces, pieces that can fold, or pieces that can twist."
In this case, comparing this 3 objects, the only one that we can clearly see the puzzle is this animation, is more didactic, as we see the previous and the result in the same plane, I don't how you saw "abstract shapes" as the square and the hexagon are in the image, clear as crystal. The "Hinged dissection 3-4-6-3 loop" (3) have different number of pieces, making difficult to understand the concept, the "Haberdasher-anm-01" (1) show us the result in a very complex manner, and have a lot of distraction, including watermarks... If I run this animation to people solve the puzzle, the third is impossible, as we have a variety of puzzles, the second they not even know what's the problem, where to go, and the representation of square is not good, people usually see the square as parallel to the horizon...
Oppose I can. Firstly, it is potentially useful. However, I'm not sure about the scope; it looks a bit too generic. I'm not sure it would be very useful to have it too specific either, though. So, since the scope is set general, I will treat these three candidates as members of the same scope, and let's look at the three animated images in the given category, shall we? Is this the more useful one of the three? No. Why? The animation is too fast. The others are better since they give you more time to see what's going on.--Peulle (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
