Temporary opposition per discussion on Commons:Valued image candidates/Pseudimbrasia deyrollei.jpg. Please generalize the scope and drop the 'drawing' part. (note: I'm sometimes offline for several days, if the scope is altered you may consider my opposition void). It is probably unlikely that a good photograph of this bird will surface soon, but this could set a precedent where we would have to add the word 'photograph' to every future nomination. Taxocat (talk) 07:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Scope fixed. --Taxocat (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not share this opinion. There will be conflict between the drawings and photographs. Both deserve to be awarded in their category. I maintain that we must add drawing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeodontosaurus (talk • contribs) 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Per just above unsigned opinion (supposed Archaeodontosaurus ?). I think that this point is very important. I'll remove my opposition if/when done. --Jebulon (talk) 13:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Opposition removed, per discussion and debate. Furthermore, this is the only illustration we have for this animal. Let's wait for a photograph.--Jebulon (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
