Question I do not understand why this image has been submitted as a VI candidate The building itself does not appear to be sufficently notable to warrant being submitted as a VI candidate (it does not appear to be classified as a national monument). When I looked the school up on Google (I coud not link to it via the image description), it did not appear to me to be a sufficiently prestigious establishment to warrant interest from outside the region where it is situated. Martinvl (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I visited this site and translated the text into English. The two clauses that were of interest to me are:
§ 43.1 For schools admit children who are at least 6 years and not exceeding 16 years.
§ 43.6 The school may ask the parents or legal guardians candidate to provide a certificate stating the child's readiness to take additional learning.
This tells me that the school is targeted at primary and secondary schoolchildren as an extra-mural qualification - locally prestigious, but not sufficiently so to even warrant a separate article in Polish - the best that I could find was here. In contrast, the article en:Guildhall School of Music and Drama has been translated into 15 other languages, en:Royal Northern College of Music into 7 other languages and en:Birmingham Conservatoire into two other languages (German and Swedish). Maybe DeFacto could direct me to the statements that demonstrate otherwise. Martinvl (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I tend to agree with Martinvl. It is not really apparent why either the building or the school would be of more than local interest. --El Grafo (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
