Oppose - Given that we already have a candidate with the scope "10 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, facade", I do not think that the gable justifies its own scope, particularly when both images were taken from the same spot. Martinvl (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinvl: "Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest". Besides, look here and see using the FastCCI gadget how many photos in this category received VI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jacek Halicki: I still feel that the scope is too narrow (and is also too narrow in many of the cases that you have mentioned). I would be happy to support this nomination if the scope were "XXXX-style gable in Poland" (where "XXXX" is an architectural type - something like "Baraoque" or "Gothic"), but I think it excessive to show the gable of every listed building in Poland. You should remember that in the first instance VIs are filters.
I don't get your weird ideas. For over a year I nominate photos in the VI and so far no one has reported any problems to the scope. I'm not going to change anything because you told me to do. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
