Commons:User scripts/users namespace/reports/User:Ukexpat/vector.js

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the report page for User:Ukexpat/vector.js. It is bot-maintained. All manual changes might be overwritten.

jshint[edit]

  1. ISSUE: line 8 character 1: document.write can be a form of eval. - Evidence: document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
  2. ISSUE: line 13 character 1: document.write can be a form of eval. - Evidence: document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
  3. ISSUE: line 20 character 67: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: if (mwEditButtons[9]) mwEditButtons[9].tagOpen = ' – ~~\~~'
  4. ISSUE: line 20 character 70: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: if (mwEditButtons[9]) mwEditButtons[9].tagOpen = ' – ~~\~~'
  5. ISSUE: line 21 character 3: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: })
  6. ISSUE: line 34 character 21: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if(wgNamespaceNumber==0) return; //avoid article space, generally speaking
  7. ISSUE: line 52 character 17: The array literal notation [] is preferable. - Evidence: var la=new Array();
  8. ISSUE: line 53 character 3: ['support'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['support']=0; la['endorse']=0;
  9. ISSUE: line 53 character 20: ['endorse'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['support']=0; la['endorse']=0;
  10. ISSUE: line 54 character 3: ['keep'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['keep']=1;
  11. ISSUE: line 55 character 3: ['oppose'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['oppose']=2; la['overturn']=2; la['object']=2;
  12. ISSUE: line 55 character 19: ['overturn'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['oppose']=2; la['overturn']=2; la['object']=2;
  13. ISSUE: line 55 character 37: ['object'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['oppose']=2; la['overturn']=2; la['object']=2;
  14. ISSUE: line 57 character 3: ['neutral'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['neutral']=4;
  15. ISSUE: line 58 character 3: ['merge'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['merge']=5; la['upmerge']=5;
  16. ISSUE: line 58 character 18: ['upmerge'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['merge']=5; la['upmerge']=5;
  17. ISSUE: line 59 character 3: ['move'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['move']=6; la['rename']=6; la['userfy']=6; la['transwiki']=6;
  18. ISSUE: line 59 character 17: ['rename'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['move']=6; la['rename']=6; la['userfy']=6; la['transwiki']=6;
  19. ISSUE: line 59 character 33: ['userfy'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['move']=6; la['rename']=6; la['userfy']=6; la['transwiki']=6;
  20. ISSUE: line 59 character 49: ['transwiki'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['move']=6; la['rename']=6; la['userfy']=6; la['transwiki']=6;
  21. ISSUE: line 60 character 3: ['redirect'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['redirect']=7;
  22. ISSUE: line 61 character 3: ['opinion'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['opinion']=8; la['relist']=8; la['subst']=8; la['salt']=8; la['change']=8;
  23. ISSUE: line 61 character 20: ['relist'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['opinion']=8; la['relist']=8; la['subst']=8; la['salt']=8; la['change']=8;
  24. ISSUE: line 61 character 36: ['subst'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['opinion']=8; la['relist']=8; la['subst']=8; la['salt']=8; la['change']=8;
  25. ISSUE: line 61 character 51: ['salt'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['opinion']=8; la['relist']=8; la['subst']=8; la['salt']=8; la['change']=8;
  26. ISSUE: line 61 character 65: ['change'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['opinion']=8; la['relist']=8; la['subst']=8; la['salt']=8; la['change']=8;
  27. ISSUE: line 63 character 3: ['comment'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['comment']=9; la['update']=9; la['note']=9;
  28. ISSUE: line 63 character 20: ['update'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['comment']=9; la['update']=9; la['note']=9;
  29. ISSUE: line 63 character 36: ['note'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['comment']=9; la['update']=9; la['note']=9;
  30. ISSUE: line 64 character 3: ['delist'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['delist']=10;
  31. ISSUE: line 65 character 3: ['question'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['question']=11;
  32. ISSUE: line 66 character 3: ['split'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['split']=12;
  33. ISSUE: line 67 character 3: ['wait'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['wait']=13;
  34. ISSUE: line 68 character 3: ['bjaodn'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: la['bjaodn']=14;
  35. ISSUE: line 83 character 5: Use '!==' to compare with 'undefined'. - Evidence: if(l!=undefined)
  36. ISSUE: line 85 character 30: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: x+="<IMG SRC='"+vt[l]+"' /> "
  37. ISSUE: line 89 character 5: Use '!==' to compare with ''. - Evidence: if(x!="") btc[i].innerHTML=x+btc[i].innerHTML;
  38. ISSUE: line 100 character 2: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: }
  39. ISSUE: line 122 character 8: Use '===' to compare with ''. - Evidence: if (ns == '' || ns == 'Talk')
  40. ISSUE: line 154 character 40: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if (document.title.indexOf('Editing ') == 0)
  41. ISSUE: line 178 character 51: Script URL. - Evidence: addPortletLink('p-cactions','javascript:copyvio()',CopyvioConfig.tabname,'ca-copyvio','request copyvio','');