Commons:User scripts/users namespace/reports/User:Mafmafmaf/monobook.js

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the report page for User:Mafmafmaf/monobook.js. It is bot-maintained. All manual changes might be overwritten.

jshint[edit]

  1. ISSUE: line 20 character 40: This character may get silently deleted by one or more browsers. - Evidence: if(document.getElementById("histlegend‎") || window.location.href.indexOf("/wiki/Special:") != -1) return;
  2. ISSUE: line 22 character 40: This character may get silently deleted by one or more browsers. - Evidence: if(document.getElementById("difference‎") || window.location.href.indexOf("/wiki/Special:") != -1) return;
  3. ISSUE: line 72 character 54: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: return addlilink(tabs, url, name, id, title, key)
  4. ISSUE: line 73 character 2: Unnecessary semicolon. - Evidence: };
  5. ISSUE: line 85 character 65: 'pname' used out of scope. - Evidence: var l=addTab("http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=" + pname + "&diff=cur&oldid=prev", 'last', '');
  6. ISSUE: line 114 character 32: The array literal notation [] is preferable. - Evidence: var classElements = new Array();
  7. ISSUE: line 115 character 13: Use '===' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: if ( node == null )
  8. ISSUE: line 117 character 12: Use '===' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: if ( tag == null )
  9. ISSUE: line 131 character 21: The array literal notation [] is preferable. - Evidence: var _GET = new Array();
  10. ISSUE: line 134 character 32: The array literal notation [] is preferable. - Evidence: var _temp_get_arr_1 = new Array();
  11. ISSUE: line 139 character 12: Variables should not be deleted. - Evidence: delete _uri; delete _temp_get_arr; delete _temp_get_arr_1;
  12. ISSUE: line 139 character 34: Variables should not be deleted. - Evidence: delete _uri; delete _temp_get_arr; delete _temp_get_arr_1;
  13. ISSUE: line 139 character 58: Variables should not be deleted. - Evidence: delete _uri; delete _temp_get_arr; delete _temp_get_arr_1;
  14. ISSUE: line 142 character 72: ['title'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: window.location = 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&'+where+'=2&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'&message='+message;
  15. ISSUE: line 142 character 112: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: window.location = 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&'+where+'=2&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'&message='+message;
  16. ISSUE: line 149 character 116: ['title'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('contentSub').innerHTML = '(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&revert=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Revert</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'revert\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&vandalism=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Vandalism</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'vandalism\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (Warn: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=1">Test</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=2">Blatant</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=3">Nonsense</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=4">Blanking</a>)';
  17. ISSUE: line 149 character 156: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('contentSub').innerHTML = '(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&revert=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Revert</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'revert\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&vandalism=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Vandalism</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'vandalism\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (Warn: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=1">Test</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=2">Blatant</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=3">Nonsense</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=4">Blanking</a>)';
  18. ISSUE: line 149 character 387: ['title'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('contentSub').innerHTML = '(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&revert=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Revert</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'revert\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&vandalism=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Vandalism</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'vandalism\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (Warn: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=1">Test</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=2">Blatant</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=3">Nonsense</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=4">Blanking</a>)';
  19. ISSUE: line 149 character 427: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('contentSub').innerHTML = '(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&revert=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Revert</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'revert\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=' + _GET['title'] + '&action=edit&oldid=' + _GET['oldid'] + '&vandalism=1&user1='+user1+'&user2='+user2+'">Vandalism</a> / <a href="javascript:var message = getMessage(\'vandalism\', \''+user1+'\', \''+user2+'\');">Message</a>) (Warn: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=1">Test</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=2">Blatant</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=3">Nonsense</a> / <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:'+user2+'&action=edit&section=new&warn=4">Blanking</a>)';
  20. ISSUE: line 151 character 99: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  21. ISSUE: line 151 character 117: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  22. ISSUE: line 151 character 150: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  23. ISSUE: line 151 character 195: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  24. ISSUE: line 151 character 213: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  25. ISSUE: line 154 character 99: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  26. ISSUE: line 154 character 117: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  27. ISSUE: line 154 character 150: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  28. ISSUE: line 154 character 195: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  29. ISSUE: line 154 character 213: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  30. ISSUE: line 154 character 234: ['message'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  31. ISSUE: line 157 character 103: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  32. ISSUE: line 157 character 121: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  33. ISSUE: line 157 character 154: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  34. ISSUE: line 157 character 199: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  35. ISSUE: line 157 character 217: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']]';
  36. ISSUE: line 160 character 103: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  37. ISSUE: line 160 character 121: ['user2'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  38. ISSUE: line 160 character 154: ['oldid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  39. ISSUE: line 160 character 199: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  40. ISSUE: line 160 character 217: ['user1'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  41. ISSUE: line 160 character 238: ['message'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = 'Reverted vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user2']+'|'+_GET['user2']+']] to version ' + _GET['oldid']+' by [[Special:Contributions/'+_GET['user1']+'|'+_GET['user1']+']] ('+_GET['message']+')';
  42. ISSUE: line 183 character 1: document.write can be a form of eval. - Evidence: document.write('<script src="'
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:User_scripts/users_namespace/reports/User:Mafmafmaf/monobook.js&oldid=530796205"