Commons:Requests for rights/Denied/Rollback/2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

15 April

[edit]
Reason for requesting rollback Dylan dynamite (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done user only has 2 edits Huib talk 21:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

16 April

[edit]
Experienced editor (active on Wikimedia since 2006) with about 4000 edits on the English Wikipedia, where I also have rollback. Paranomia (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - you have under 50 edits to Commons and are quite inactive here. I'm not sure you demonstrate the needed experience. Sorry. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I already use rollback on en:w (as ComputerGuy) and I'd like to help eliminate vandilism. ComputerGuy890100 (talk) 21:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure whether you are too familiar with Commons policy in general. Can you please explain edits like this? Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see a lot of test edits like this, I would say no Huib talk 04:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Apply after more experience. Rocket000 (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

18 April

[edit]
I have rollbacker rights on enwiki. Useful to fight vandalism etc. Computerjoe (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not very active on Commons as far as I can see. --Herby talk thyme 14:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not particularly, but I'm quite familiar with policies etc and I can be trusted with the permission. Computerjoe (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is your opinion, not mine. Others may agree or not - we will see. --Herby talk thyme 14:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Herby. An editor since 2006 but only with a total edit count of 381 and distinct page edits of 247 as well as looking at your contributions seems not to have much activity. Maybe help out a bit more within the project and you will no doubt be given Rollback but for now I just don't feel it should be granted due to the inactive activity. Bidgee (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Per Herby and Bidgee. Please come back as you are more active Huib talk 14:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

22 April

[edit]
reason for requesting rollback

For vandalism fighting, Thank you.Jeremybliss (talk) 09:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing like enough contribs I'm afraid, sorry  Not done --Herby talk thyme 09:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

23 April

[edit]
I already have the rollback feature on en.wp. Thank you. ChrisDHDR 17:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User has only 158 edits. I think, that it is not enough.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per Anatoliy Huib talk 19:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24 April

[edit]
reason for requesting rollback Thank you. Janez Alejandro (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. 2 edits - not sufficient contributions to review how you would use the tool. --Kanonkas(talk) 14:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May

[edit]
I revert vandalism on the English Wikipedia and have rollback rights there - I'd like to expand my vandal fighting interests to commons as well. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 07:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Thanks for volunteering to help out at Commons which is very much appreciated. However, you are active here for just a week only, mainly uploading photographs (which are very much welcomed, too). We will certainly reconsider a new application next month when you got more familiar with Commons. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July

[edit]
Need it for reverting vandalism fast. Thank you. Jet123 (talk) 21:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You have too few contributions.--Kwj2772 (msg) 00:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October

[edit]
I've been an active contributor to the es:wiki. I'm not exactly requesting rights. For some reason my browser's cache wouldn't refresh and I seem to have made a mess with this upload File:Patricia 2009 Oct 12 1445Z.jpg. Ended up making it worse when tried to fix it. I finally got the pic I wanted uploaded but it looks as if I did it the wrong way, or didn't I? It's happened before and I wondered if there could be some way I could revert that kind of mistake myself. Otherwise, consider this my request for information on proceedings for such cases. Thank you. Izmir2 (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you don't appear to be requesting rollback rights. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
reason for requesting rollback Thank you. Vascosom (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✘ Rollbacker status not granted. It is your first edit. Kwj2772 (msg) 10:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to request the rollback flag here because I currently have it at the Simple English Wikipedia, the English Wikipedia, and am a bureaucrat and sysop on the Simple English Wiktionary, as well as having global rollback. I do not want to go over the heads of the users here by using my global rollback right here, so I would rather request local rollback instead so that I know that you guys approve of it. Thank you. Razorflame 21:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done} - based on your editcount here I would say no, you have made 54 edits in 2 years and this request is your first edit in 5 months, I would say become more active with fighting vandalism first because I do not see why you have te need for Rollback.
But like the header says feel free to use your global rollback here, even after my oppose. Huib talk 05:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's fine to use your GR here :) –Juliancolton | Talk 12:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my mistake! I didn't see that notice up there. Sorry for wasting your time on this request! Razorflame 16:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]