Commons:Featured picture candidates/image:Landscape of Florence.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
image:Landscape of Florence.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2011 at 23:34:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Fabio Ginestrini - uploaded by Fabio Ginestrini - nominated by Fabio Ginestrini -- Fabio ginestrini (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Fabio ginestrini (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Well, I can understand that this picture had to be rotated a few degrees CW to correct the tilt. Yet, I believe a top-and-bottom crop would've been the finishing touch. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry Maurilbert, you are absolutely right, crop done. -- Fabio ginestrini (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacking areal perspective and too blurry.--Snaevar (talk) 23:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose quality not good enough, disturbing motive --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- ...Motive? -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Question Is this a panorama? This actually looks like a regular scenery photograph. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment It is an 82 degree photo stitching panorama (8x3 +/-2ev 55mm 3872x2592 exposures). To me it seems very sharp and rich of details. The main historical buildings of the city are visible. Cypress and olive trees in the near field are among the most popular features of the Tuscany land. In my opinion the major technical flaw is the overexposure of white walls of some buildings hit by the sunlight, visible at the pixel scale. -- Fabio ginestrini (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Seems well-stitched and lacking of distortion. A bit hazy though. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 21:57, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)