Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg

file:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2009 at 10:42:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/file:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/file:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg

•  Info created by Didier Descouens - uploaded by archaeodontosaurus - nominated by archaeodontosaurus -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Somehow reminds me of File:Haeckel Prosobranchia.jpg. I love Kunstformen der Natur. -- JovanCormac 11:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy - poor quality for studioshot. —kallerna™ 21:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent work! Jacopo Werther (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition is appealing, but I agree with kallerna. Also DOF could be larger. --NEUROtiker ^⇌ 06:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Petritap (talk) 11:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see the quality issues kallerna does, and I think the focus and depth of field are fine. ++Lar: t/c 14:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, your idea for this composition is good, but the space between the objects is imo much too small and the picture is too noisy. -- Ra'ike T C 20:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Phyrexian (talk) 00:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with the the spacing as Ra'ike.--Estrilda (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects