Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Yellowstone Castle Geysir Edit.jpg

Info created by Flicka - uploaded by Arad M - nominated by Arad M --Arad 21:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo failed a few days ago. Here is the edited version. --Arad 21:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I feel that the good composition, 'WOW factor' and the interesting use of a wide-angle lens compensate for the slight lack of sharpness. Freedom to share 06:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ack Freedom to share --JaGa 06:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose see below. Lycaon 06:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - I can't see any significant lack of sharpness but my bells aren'r ringing. Is there a tilt in the picture? - Alvesgaspar 07:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question Don't tilted?--Beyond silence 16:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really love it... Okay, it's my own picture ;-) . But I'm a little bit confused. Should I withdraw my original nomination now? This one seems to get more support. --Flicka 16:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Yes, I think you should. And what about the tilt?... - Alvesgaspar 20:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I get your question right, but I don't have a tilt/shift lens if that's what you mean. Otherwise maybe someone could explain it to me (in German?) --Flicka 16:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Or do you a mean a perspective correction cause of the wide angle? Yes, I made a correction on Photoshop, but I don't know how to call the tool in English (in German its "Perspektivisch Verzerren"). But as far as I know, "tilt" has something to do with a changed DOF and not with a perspective correction. --Flicka 19:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that the image seems not to be horizontal, but I may be wrong - Alvesgaspar 20:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a tilt. I thought there was when I was editing then I found out that it's only the hills that look like tilted. Look at the people on the right side, they are perfectly vertical and the forest on the left is horizontal. --Arad 22:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So this is what you mean with "tilt"... Okay, to be honest, the picture has had a tilt before, but I made a correction, and the people where the only object in the picture that were suppposed to be vertical so I took them for orientation. But maybe they were all drunk, so I can't be sure that the picture is correct now. ;-) In fact there was no time to take a tripod. --Flicka 18:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose If you enlarge, all the trees that you can measure lean to the left. The fact that the people don't (or not that much) may be because of the perspective correction you made. You may have corrected the tilt on one side but not on the other. Sorry. --MichaelMaggs 21:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lestat 08:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Near acceptable, with looking on value.--Beyond silence 10:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 10:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Walké 20:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- WoowW!! Yug (talk) 08:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Cecil 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info created by Flicka - uploaded by Calibas - nominated by Calibas --Calibas 03:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I managed to squeeze a little more sharpness out of it. Calibas 03:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again one of those forced nominations, where quality is such that the picture is beyond fixing (unless you rescale it to 600x800 and that's only half of where you are now!!). These pictures will still look great in wikipedia articles, but for an FP, much more (technical) quality is required. I oppose for lack of details (combination of noise and oversharpening) and the small size (the ever shrinking image: 2592 × 3888 -> 1800 × 2700 -> 1333 × 2000 -> 1155 × 1733). Lycaon 05:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both pics are great. The composition and color are gorgeous, I don't see problems with noise or oversharpening, and they both still exceed 2 megapixels. --JaGa 07:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Cecil 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu