Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Upernavik evening panorama 2007-08-08 cropped sharpened.jpg

Image:Upernavik evening panorama 2007-08-08 cropped sharpened.jpg, featured

•  Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Slaunger --Slaunger 20:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Info This is already a QI, but I am curious to see if you, dear reviewers, also find it FP worthy...
•  Neutral --Slaunger 20:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's a good picture, with a nice composition, nice colours and lighting of an unusual place. I haven't spotted any stitching error as well. On the other hand I think it's a biiiit soft and a biiit noisy, but really no reason to oppose for lme. Benh 21:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Excellent work on the panorama, but the lighting and softness detract enough that in my opinion it's not FP worthy. Dori | Talk 21:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, it is a bit noisy and not exactly razor sharp. But the excellent composition and colours mitigate those minor flaws - Alvesgaspar 22:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I remember seeing this at Photography critiques and thinking what a great picture this was. Now that it is cropped and the blurred spots are gone, I think this is good enough for FP despite the fact that it isn't super sharpness. --Digon3 ^talk 23:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info The pano from photography critiques Digon3 is referring to is this one in its third iteration. One of the many photos in that stitch was out of focus and it was not recoverable. But actually, instead of cropping that out I went out and retook the scenary on another nice evening, this time using a stone as tripod. I wanted to get the best possible resolution, so I zoomed in and took plenty of photos with large overlap in pano mode on my Canon IXUS 800 IS compact camera. The camera names its images nnA, nnB, nnC and so forth, but what I did not realize was that I got to nnZ while shooting the left most part of town and the camera kept on saving images as nnZ, thus overwriting my photos. As a consequence I actually did not get the leftmost part of the town (see this helicopter shot to get another impression of the town) included in the FP candidate pano I have nominated here. But now the subject is 4000 km and 3000$ away in flight tickets.... -- Slaunger 06:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Oh, so this is a different picture? So thats how you got rid of the soft spots. --Digon3 ^talk 13:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support good pano of a, I guess, not very often photographed place. Nice colours and evening mood --Simonizer 14:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 16:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Benh and Alvesgaspar --LucaG 19:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support as other supporters. Lycaon 21:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 12:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support good enough. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 14:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Simonizer 17:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)