Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Une guêpe sur son nid en papier.jpg


Original version	Version with noise reduction

Info created and uploaded by J-Luc - nominated by J-Luc 15:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J-Luc 15:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info The same wasp, taken this afternoon. I have tried to take care about the noise (400ASA), the sun (taken in the shadow), the composition. Made 100, kept only 1... :-)
Support Vassil 23:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--João Carvalho 14:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really like this picture, especially the colors. I can not understand why you cutted the wing. In my eyes the cutted wing destroys the whole picture. A hard decission for me. --Makro Freak 08:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info I have used a tripod, it was centered on the wasp "looking" at me. Suddendly, she took this position and I was happy to have it "3/4" but did not have the time to unscrew/reposition the tripod, I "forced" the tripod to change the composition and I took care not to crop the antennas (first plane) but sorry for the wing. Ok for the "noise" but I don't see a lot of noise on the EOS20D at 400ISO...

See reponse below... (J-Luc)

result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info The background is so far oof that it's easy to remove the noise from it --MichaD | Michael Apel 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaD | Michael Apel 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vassil 22:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dont like the crop --Bergwolf 22:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really like this picture, especially the colors. I can not understand why you cutted the wing. In my eyes the cutted wing destroys the whole picture. A hard decission for me. --Makro Freak 08:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Several "quality images" are croped. A very little part of my wasp wing is missing, but these are example where the crop is sometimes more important. The rules must be the same for everybody.

Comment None of the example pictures would get support from me. You cannot fit this cropping thing in rules. This is a personal aspect. --Makro Freak ^talk 11:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Ok, I give up. I am afraid that technical aspects are more important that emotional and artistic considerations.
Comment Spoken for me, it should have both. --Makro Freak ^talk 15:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info - I agree, but keep in mind that it is amateur work... (J-Luc)
- I allways have this in my mind. If you post this whole FP List onto fotocommunity.de -->fotocommunity.de as a example, you will get not a single response on any picture. The benchmark is very low here onto Commons.--Makro Freak ^talk 22:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - What I don't like in this picture is the extreme close-up, making only a small part of the wasp focused. But that is also a personnal preference I suppose. - Alvesgaspar 19:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info - I like this "E.T. monster with helmet" effect... (J-Luc) 19:46 (UTC), 2007/07/02
Support - Beautiful macro shot, great details in the eye zone, shallow depth of field is not really a problem here. Cropped wings are a bit annoying but is far from "killing the image". --Nattfodd 23:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Winiar^✉ 08:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Even most parts of the head are not really sharp. --wau > 22:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 21:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu