Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Silvereyepairofjuveniles.jpg

Silvereye - Zosterops lateralis, not featured

•  Info created by and nominated by --Benjamint444 02:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC) this shot was taken in an orchard (thus the OOF netting in the BG) the two juveniles on the left are sharp and clear, the adult is, unfortunately OOF but it still adds to the image as it is feeding the chick some fruit.
•  Support and self Nom --Benjamint444 02:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose it anoys me the noise coming from the jpg format. specially to be seen in the eyes at full size-LadyofHats 07:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Question What happened to the EXIF data? Lycaon 10:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support wonderful norro 10:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Romary 17:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Supportwell it took me some time, but i give a pro. The technical quality definitively leaves sth to be desired....but the scene is simply great. I hope i wont regret that decision ;) --AngMoKio 19:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC) changed vote to oppose due to lack of information abt retouching --AngMoKio 21:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Jeses 21:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
•  InfoThe EXIF data was lost when I edited the image in photoshop.--Benjamint444 00:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

•  Info EXIF is easily restored. E.g. by pasting the finished image into the the original and trimming unwanted parts... Lycaon 07:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral - nice, though the adult is a bit out of focus, and the non-natural (metal) perches don't look too good (it would be nicer if they were perched on twigs) - MPF 01:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
•  OpposeI dont like the background, otherwise nice pic -- Simonizer 13:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support. I love it! Spectacular scene. The feathers are so clear, I never realized how different a juvenile bird's fluff is. I'm not seeing whatever LadyofHats is seeing, and while humans might prefer for birds to sit on twigs, birds sit where they please. Rusted metal is fine to my eyes. — coelacan — 08:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Tbc 23:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely Yann 23:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Yann 00:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Birds pictures blende with background --Karelj 22:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful bird down texture... and the composition is cool. Vmenkov 19:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment (P.S. In connection to the discussion below: of course, an explanation of the method of production of this picture - composing from two shots, or whatever - would be highly appropriate! I would prefer to see an original, pre-photo-shopped image, and would be glad to vote for it to be fetured. Vmenkov 23:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC))
•  Oppose Photoshopped. Left side is mirrored from the right, possibly it's even the same chick. See comments on en.wiki. ~ trialsanderrors 19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack trialsanderrors. -- Lycaon 20:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose background is distracting --Ibn Battuta 03:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support lovely family portrait. pfctdayelise(说什么?) 08:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC
  •  Comment It's not a family portrait. The chicks on the left are one and the same. ~ trialsanderrors 09:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose deceitful photomaniplation. --Dschwen 11:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support // tsca [re] 14:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per trialsanderrors. Debivort 17:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image posted on the English Wikipedia FP page by trialsanderrors shows pretty conclusively that the picture is not what it purports to be. The veracity of another image by the same uploader is also being queried here. --MichaelMaggs 18:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Shameful. — coelacan — 20:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 11 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 00:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)