Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rosa canina .jpg

Image:Rosa canina .jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Lycaon -- Lycaon 23:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lycaon 23:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral Composition wise I would have preferred the flower in the lower right, rather than upper left, due to how it's pointing. Dori - Talk 23:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, posterization and artifacts in the background, don't like the composition, no wow factor for FP. --JaGa 04:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition, light, sharpness. --Beyond silence 12:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Agree with Dori. Excellent quality but wrong framing - Alvesgaspar 14:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  •  Support - After the edit, though a little more of black would be even better - Alvesgaspar 20:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Alvesgaspar. --MichaelMaggs 16:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice after the edit. --MichaelMaggs 21:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose probably postedition effects (like on samples below). --Lestat 18:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author. Lycaon 20:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC) thank you. Lycaon 14:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment Issues on samples below have been taken care of (I hope). Lycaon 14:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agree with other opposers ; flower leds my eye to the left, and there's nothing but the border to see... Pity because very nice otherwise. Benh 20:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Support I made an attemps of reedit at home, similar to that one, and ended up in thinking that it was too centered which is why I didn't uploaded it. However, I think it's much better ; very bioutiful colours ! Benh 20:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Question Would cropping to portrait help? The image is fairly large (almost 9 Mpx). Lycaon 08:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Maybe, but I'd be sad you cut a leaf... Why not extending the black area on the left instead ? Benh 19:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
    • I 'moved' the flower a bit to the right. Please reassess. Lycaon 20:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I like it now, so I changed my vote - Alvesgaspar 20:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm having a tough time seeing how this can be a FP considering the following easily fixed flaws:
  
  

noise and posterization

glowing edges

not sure what this is

These are all crops from the picture viewed at 100%. I've seen many pictures get stomped for much less. Also, though, what about the rest of the picture? The leaves have ugly brown spots, the flower casts a distracting shadow over some of the leaves, one of the petals has bite-mark looking indentations on it, the center looks too bright, and the focus isn't that great. FP has high standards, and that's great, but this picture isn't getting the usual level of scrutiny. --JaGa 06:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment - I think that the slight noise, as well as the noise/artifacts along the border of the petals should be removed - Alvesgaspar 07:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• This is the background, not the main subject... --Beyond silence 13:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, but this is going for FP, not QI. Is that really the best Commons has to offer? --JaGa 17:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Lighting, shadows, the Wowfactormeter did not move, even with new batteries.--Tomascastelazo 17:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured --Laitche 06:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)