Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Naghshe Jahan Square Isfahan.jpg

Info created by Arad - uploaded by Arad - nominated by Arad (selfnom) --Arad 05:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's one of the best images we have on this subject. Thanks in advance for your votes. --Arad 05:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Great subject. However images such as this rely on good symmetry. The top archway 'framing' is far from centred relative to the central distant building. There is also a slight tilt and the people are distracting. Snowwayout 06:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know this. But I also think it's impossible to move the whole monument in order to make in centred. --Arad 08:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose not centered --Jacopo86 11:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition Lestat 11:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition really suffers because of the lack of symmetry. --MichaelMaggs 16:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose what's the subject? Metoc 20:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose yeah the symmetry is very bad, and really detracts from this fine image. Arjun 18:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CommentDoes it help if I crop it? Or it's going to be worst? I'll be thankful if you give me some ideas. --66.36.154.65 21:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The best thing to do is to shoot it again. The problem is the axes of symmetry of the foreground (the arch) and background (the alley in the garden) do not coincide. Alvesgaspar 12:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yeah maybe. If this year I go to Isfahan, I'll shoot it again but lots of things must have changed since this image is pretty old. --Arad 20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- MartinD 13:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It would probably be better if photographed without the top archway (unless it could be composed differently) and I think this one is blurred too much. --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 04:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 2 support, 7 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 11:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info I took another shot. :) -- AM 16:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Diligent 09:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- How the F*** Did u do that? I'm going to sue you. ;-). But you forgot to give credit to me! Good job. -- Arad 19:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Aren't you going to support your own creation? --Arad 19:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the interesting picture and the help of photoshop. -- AM 21:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Moved the nomination up so people can vote for the edited version before time runs out. --Arad 01:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MPF 17:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice picture but not special enough for FP. Composition is just fine, image is not sharp. Alvesgaspar 18:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ahh, I though you want more FPs. hehe. It's ok, you gave your opinion anyway. --Arad 01:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Good one Arad. --Mehran Moghtadai 02:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture is tilt. The streets are falling to the right. Simonizer 12:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, didn't see it before. Turned to the left by 0,5 degrees, no more tilt now. -- AM 13:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 1. Photoshoped (not a real photograph, which is not stated in the description), 2. Trees and other objects in the right corner are not copied too good, 3. Blurred too much. --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 04:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed those trees, and stated that this is edited. But for the tilt, I think we have to do something again. --Arad 04:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think that unless it is physically possible to make such shot this picture shouldn't be featured. --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 16:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- MartinD 4:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Support - nice shot with good resolution -- Marmoulak 05:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lycaon 10:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose norro 18:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great subject. Snowwayout 06:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 8 support, 5 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 16:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu