Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Moving sidewalk scheme.svg

Image:Moving sidewalk scheme.svg, featured

Escalator Escalator, no circles

•  Info created by MesserWoland - uploaded by MesserWoland - nominated by Leafnode --Leafnode 12:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Leafnode 12:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Maire 12:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wpedzich 13:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support :D M@rcin Suwalczan [talk] 13:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Szczepan dyskusja Mail 13:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral (for now) Will support if following issues are addressed: arrows (full line, narrower head) and circles around numbers disturb. Lycaon 13:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Is there such a thing as a Polish grapevine ?? ;-)) Lycaon 13:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

   Comment It's our secret plot to... whoops ;) --Leafnode 23:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral - ditto to Lycaon; also number sequence is somewhat illogical (my suggestion would be clockwise numbering from the left; 1. Electric motor, 2. Drive gear, 3. Handrail drive, 4. Handrail, 5. Step, 6. Return wheel, 7. Chain guide, 8. Inner rail) - MPF 14:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --WarX 17:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC) But renumerize and make thinner strokes around numbers ;)
•  Support. Great illustration! But is it really called moving sidewalk? It's an escalator! --Dschwen 22:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Ah well, maybe you guys have moving sidewalks and flying cars over there in warsaw, who knows ;-) --Dschwen 22:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice one! Herr Kriss 23:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Packa 06:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Image has been changed according to comments. Also version without baloons has been prepared (if you like vote for it below) --Leafnode 10:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I like baloons :) --norro 09:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Masti 19:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC) moving sidewalk up-the-hill :)
•  Support gren 10:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose until the kink in the handrail is fixed. ~ trialsanderrors 00:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => featured. Simonizer 06:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Fixed version, no baloons, not featured

•  Info fixed according to comments above (ordering, arrow lines, additionally no baloons) and uploaded by Leafnode based on image by MesserWoland--Leafnode 23:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Lycaon 07:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Diligent 10:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks! MPF 11:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Support. Always wondered how those things worked. In Paris, at La Défense, there are always at least two mechanical stairs broken, no idea why.
  Numbers seem still pretty big (I tend to compare their size to the real-size of the mechanical stair, so they are big). --Atoma 14:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

A real size escalator would also have about 4 or 5 times as many steps :-) MPF 19:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Support --MichaelMaggs 16:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Thermos 03:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support really nice! Viele-baeren 21:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral - The level of detail is much lower for the handrail system than it is for the step system. For example, at the inflexion points of the handrail, there should be some kind of wheel, which is not depicted. BTW, some of these inflexions seem too sharp to be real. Also, I agree with MPF about the number of steps. - Alvesgaspar 10:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

   Comment I believe that this image is supposed to depict stair mechanism, only signing presence of handrail but not focusing on it. But maybe author of this image should make some comment. --Leafnode 17:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral, I actually prefer the circles for this image... they only cover background space and make for better image mapping. gren 10:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose until the kink in the handrail is fixed. ~ trialsanderrors 00:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. (Original has more support votes) Simonizer 06:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)