Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Moon Monster2.jpg

Image:Moon_Monster2.jpg - featured

•  Info created by RufusTeleStrat - uploaded by RufusTeleStrat - nominated by RufusTeleStrat --66.75.145.21 05:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --RufusTeleStrat 05:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support. Nice. Do you have a higher resolution avaiable? --Dschwen 08:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support but too small Lestat 08:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Excellent picture, but resolution is too low -- Simonizer 08:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support cool! --Jacopo86 08:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Rama 09:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support despite low res. --Diligent 12:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support. A shame there is no high-res version. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose resolution too low for a subject that far -- Gorgo 20:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)  Support now. But maybe even better if it was cropped a little bit (top, bottom) -- Gorgo 19:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support impressive --XN 21:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Javierme 21:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting. It's to bad the resolution is somewhat lacking. -Gphoto 00:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Dori | Talk 04:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low res and I don't see why it is interesting...--Hi-tacks 14:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Info high-res now available -- Gorgo 19:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment The right one is the high res version. (3872 x 2592) --Digon3 17:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Digon3 17:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Great -- Simonizer 17:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - Alvesgaspar 19:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support / tsca @ 22:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support lightening and mood make this picture excellent --Ikiwaner 11:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice picture, almost looks like an UFO is going to fly throught the cloud :P //moralist 15:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a cool picture... but, not technically a great one... I realize it doesn't need to fit into an article like on EN... but, it still doesn't quite make the grade for me. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Grenavitar (talk • contribs) 15:18, 5 November 2006
•  Oppose - don't care for nighttime cityscapes - MPF 19:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Urban 06:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment This doesn't look quite right to me. Is this photo a composite? From the Exif data, it was taken with a lens at 52mm. At these focal lengths on an SLR, the moon usually looks like litte more than a dot. Perhaps, high cirrus is further diffusing the light from the moon before illuminating the mid level clouds. -- Solipsist 08:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment This is as it came out of the camera other than some straighting of the horizon. The shot was slightly tilted. Auto White balance, taken with my D200, and the 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom Nikkor that came in the kit. It was almost an afterthought shot. I had been wanting a long shot with the telephot to compress the shot, but the moon had come up obsured and not that great of a shot. Took a few, had removed my 80-200, and replaced it with the walking around lens, and the moon popped up and I saw it going towards the cloud bank. Click click and this is it.-RUFRufustelestrat 19:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Ziga 14:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support alifazal 15:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support (Self-censoring banned template.) Jon Harald Søby 16:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Nice -- Lerdsuwa 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support The fact that someone thought it's a composite says a lot. – flamurai 21:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice Picture. I like the Sky as it is, but this picture is not in focus and a bit too grainy to be a featured pic. Please try again.--SvonHalenbach 01:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral It is a really neat picture, but I agree with others in that it is too blurry and grainy for an FP. I just like the picture too much to oppose it, though! Definitely try submitting more pictures such as this. --Thisisbossi 01:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
•  Support It was good enough that i chose it as my wallpaper. The blur is only visible at max res and only if you reduce it to half, you can't notice anything. --Arad 14:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

 25 support, 1 neutral, 5 oppose >> featured Alvesgaspar 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)