Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mamiya 645 Super system.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Mamiya 645 Super system.svg, featured[edit]
Info Photographed, composed, modified and uploaded by Eric Gaba (Sting), a wikigraphist. Nominated by Yug (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment by Yug : amazing work, perfectly done, showing several possibilities to customize a Mamiya 645 Super camera. I think that this images is of an higher quality, but also perfectly encyclopedic. --Yug (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC) (please correct my English)
Support --Yug (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)- Comment Is there a language neutral version? Also, this would be better as an SVG. --Digon3 11:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm missing source information about the used photographs. --norro 13:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm also the author of the individual photographs. Sting 20:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- All this was totally made by Sting, that is also why it´s really astonishing. Yug (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm also the author of the individual photographs. Sting 20:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support - High quality illustration. Why not a modern digital Mamiya? - Alvesgaspar 21:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- ... because it's the one I have... Sting 21:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support Excellent work + language neutral Berrucomons 21:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support High quality illustration --norro 21:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Makro Freak 21:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. --Digon3 23:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Lycaon 07:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose --WarX 13:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC) It's not a vector graphic, but only bitmap embedded in SVG file :(:(:(:(
- The paths, arrows and numbers are… I would be very pleased if you can tell me how to vectorize a photograph and still keep it looking like a photograph… People asked to change it from JPG to a language neutral PNG or SVG, and so did I. I choose the SVG because the PNG file was far much heavier. Sting 14:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, your efforts are very much appreciated. Lycaon 15:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Of course they are. But people seeing SVG will think it's vector graphic, not bitmap with vector elements and cause that it should not be FP (in my opinion)--WarX 15:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. : When I first created this picture (mid 2006), Inkscape didn't allow embed raster images in SVG file, now it's possible and perfect for many applications. And with its powerful vectorization, it is a delight. This one, imo, is a very simple example, but try it, it's really amazing… a priceless toy for Wikigraphists ! OK, those pictures are not 100% vector graphics, but I think it shouldn't restrict us to create high visual results. For a vector topographic map, take out the raster shaded relief and it will loose 50% of its legibility. Sting 16:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Of course they are. But people seeing SVG will think it's vector graphic, not bitmap with vector elements and cause that it should not be FP (in my opinion)--WarX 15:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, your efforts are very much appreciated. Lycaon 15:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- The paths, arrows and numbers are… I would be very pleased if you can tell me how to vectorize a photograph and still keep it looking like a photograph… People asked to change it from JPG to a language neutral PNG or SVG, and so did I. I choose the SVG because the PNG file was far much heavier. Sting 14:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support I think it shows nicely that SVG and embedded images can be combined if done right. /Daniel78 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support (but anyway the embedded bitmaps have quite low resolution, so details of the elements are difficult to see). Verdy p 20:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 07:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
