Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MC SanFranciscoPano.jpg

Image:MC SanFranciscoPano.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Chmehl --Chmehl 13:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Chmehl 13:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - would look a lot better in daytime - MPF 14:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info - During daytime such a view is almost impossible due to clouds, fog, and/or smog. That's why I took the picture in the evening after a rainy day. - Chmehl 05:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Woa ! I very much like this one. It's sharp, it's technically flawless as far as I can see and know and the composition is very original to me. Benh 15:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support yep ^ --che 15:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Urby2004 18:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose nothig special, poor copmosition.. --Karelj 21:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have a problem with having to look through the golden gate bridge. It is a very nice picture otherwise. --Digon3 13:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Urban 18:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral This is a very artistic and beautiful shot. But in evaluating it, I asked myself if I didn't know it was a famous bridge, what would I think? In that case I find the vertical bars distracting. Alas, often we choose the less artistic pictures over the artistic ones because they have more educational value. -- Ram-Man 20:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Hugo.arg 21:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose dark, disturbing composition. Lycaon 05:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose bridge is only distracting, bit dark --Leafnode 06:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- ack Ram-Man, alas. I'dve been neutral-support if there was not foreground bridge/bars. --Spundun 21:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support great quality. interesting composition. --Dschwen 20:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)