Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:London 360 from St Paul's Cathedral - Sept 2007.jpg

Image:London 360 from St Paul's Cathedral - Sept 2007.jpg, featured

•  Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by LucaG 21:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator. I'm not an expert about panos but this one really impressed me and the wow factor is 100% --LucaG 21:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive sharpness ! How many cranes in the picture ? Vassil 23:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great pano. Dori | Talk 04:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wow --Simonizer 07:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely outstanding! - gobeirne 08:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Technically impressive... I wonder what kind of machine Diliff uses to compute this picture ; 3x17 12Mpix pictures, that must require a lot of memory, especially during the blending process... Unless Diliff scales his pics down before stitching them. Lots of details... lots of cranes too (unfortunately). I noticed several stitching errors which makes me believe this might be a little too much pictures for the result. Still, I think it's a great picture overall ! Benh 09:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support One of most wow photos that I have ever seen! May the overexposed parts can be fixed. --Beyond silence 11:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support : je crois qu'il va être difficile de faire mieux. Thierry Caro 12:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I agree. Superb. --MichaelMaggs 15:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Despite the stitching errors. --Digon3 ^talk 19:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive picture. I like the difference with the light of the day and the shadow (I'm not sure it's understandable ^^'). Ceridwen 20:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Here is my guess : light comes from one side, therefore on a 360° pano it lightens the buildings on a half of it and casts shadows on the other half, hence the difference you talk about. Actually, I was even wondering how Diliff managed to handle the difference of contrast so well. Benh 21:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral please have a look at Image:Londonpanorama.jpg--Hendrixeesti 08:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

  And...? I've checked it and it's terribly overexposed, also made during not so good weather, because of what is dark and gloomy (but maybe this is how a picture of London should look like...? ;) ). --Leafnode 09:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Support --Dongio 14:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great!!! --elemaki 19:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Tone 13:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wow!!! Sanchezn 20:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support impressive! --Leafnode 09:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR 20:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support It´s absolutely perfect! One of the best pictures I ever saw! --Lucas Löffler 00:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I need a wall-sized monitor after seeing this! Suggestion: Add geodata to the image page. Adds value. -- Slaunger 06:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Out of principal. I don't expect my vote to have any effect on the nomination, but I think that Diliff should at least have done an effort to fix the many stitching errors that are scattered all over the image. Lycaon 12:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support As a Londoner I must say that that is one of the best pictures Ive ever seen! Nothing but respct is due for that amazing shot! --James.h.floyd 01:48, 21 March 2008(GMT)

result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Simonizer 19:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)