Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lily Lilium 'Citronella' Flower 2578px.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Lily Lilium 'Citronella' Flower 2578px.jpg, featured[edit]
- Info The genus Lilium are herbaceous flowering plants normally growing from bulbs, comprising a genus of about 110 species in the lily family, Liliaceae. As shown a Lily Lilium 'Citronella'
- Info created & uploaded by Ram-Man nominated by --Richard Bartz 23:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Impressive picture, superb colors --Richard Bartz 23:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Good colouring but unbalanced composition - Alvesgaspar 00:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - It is not only the presence of the other flower but also the tigth and assymmetrical framing which make the composition less good - Alvesgaspar 07:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Great pop, but not too much, great color JaGa 02:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Obviously. FWIW, I cropped it as such to keep it from being symmetrical and centered, which some people like, some don't, apparently. -- Ram-Man 02:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I know some people don't like removing elements from images, but this could look better with the other flower removed I think. Here's my quick attempt (someone could probably do a better job). Dori | Talk 04:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well done :) Can you please add a retouched picture template on this edit, and i will support that version, too --Richard Bartz 13:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition, colours, light, sharpness! --Beyond silence 08:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support I was about to nominate this one when I saw it at QI, but was (a bit) annoyed by the background. I like the colours and details. I first agreed with Alvespaspar on the composition issue, but after a try to remove the right part, I think it's much better this way. Benh 11:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colours. I actually like the composition - the empty blue space adds to the contrast and makes the flower all the more beautiful. Doo-dle-doo 23:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 19:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Edited Version, not featured[edit]
- Comment In spite of two facts (1, that I got really bored reading all of the guidelines about FP and images in general; and 2, I could only see two of the four gray circles drawn in the test SVG), if the edited version is going to be used, I have what I think is a better editing of it. The version displayed here has swirls of blue where the unwanted flower parts used to be. There seems to be nothing in the guidelines about how to manage an opinion and image upload of this nature. I am actually worried about undue retribution if I happen to touch the wrong contributors images. What to do? carol 14:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- I would say reupload it to replace the version I uploaded. Leave the licenses as they are, and that should be all I would think. Dori | Talk 15:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if the image is better without the stuff, but at least the blue swirls are gone. Sorry Dori, I didn't look at who made the edits. carol 15:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think removing is needed. --Beyond silence 16:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 19:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)