Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Human skeleton front en.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Human skeleton front en.svg, featured[edit]
Info created, uploaded and nominated by LadyofHats --LadyofHats 15:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)- Info this is the front view of a female skeleton. i will also nominate the back view, even when i like to see the both images as one. the svg file of both convined would be too big. One of the main advantages of this diagrams is that each bone is done independently. --LadyofHats 15:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Support --Beyond silence 16:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)- Support Ditto. JaGa 17:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 17:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
- Support -- Benh 20:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs 21:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --LucaG 22:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Digon3 talk 23:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Luc Viatour 05:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Leafnode 06:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Oppose --WarX 16:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC) to small fonts, should be at least 150% of used size- done -LadyofHats 18:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --WarX 16:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks ;)
- Support Doo-dle-doo 20:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Question and 
Comment The terms used seems to be a mixture of Latin and English. Why not use an English only or Latin only terminology or make a version for each of the two languages. See also my elaborated comment for the back view above. Oh, and by the way, is there a point in using different colours (blue or red) for the lines that point out the bones in the skeleton? There may be an obvious explanation, but apparently I am not smart enough to figure it out, and the image page does not help me. -- Slaunger 21:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)- red is for single bones and therefor singular names. blue stands for groups of bones, like by example the skull wich is a name for a group of bones. As for weather the names languages and wich names where used, well i believe that comes from my sources. if well all of them seem to be mixed in someway. the printed reference i have is in german/latin, my online references are mustly english/latin. where i must notice that there is not an agreement in wich terms should apear, while some make mention of things like eye sokets, false ribs, 1st and 12 rib, Angulus arcus pubis, and even every skull bone mention independently. i desided to reach a middle point in wich i mention the bones or main bone groups with more often apearing name for them. if you would have a look on the english wikipedia you would realise they have the same problem when talking about the human skeleton. this is also why i didnt made a numbered version but instead uploaded a version without labels. so that eachone could edit the file to adapt it to their actual needs-LadyofHats 21:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply to my lengthy comments and questions. In any case I suggest you add the colour legend explanation to the image page description as it helps understanding what is going on. I also understand that the mixed-language terminology is due to mixed sources. Considering that FP is for the-best-of-the-best (and the illustration in itself is of very high technical quality IMO), it would be really nice if an anatomy-proficient person could help correct/double-check the terms for consistency. -- Slaunger 22:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support see the other one. __ ABF __ ϑ 14:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Well done encyclopedic illustration. --Egg 11:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose --Dezidor 13:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Please state a reason for opposing in courtesy of the nominator. -- Slaunger 13:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- Reasons and comments same as those I've stated for the accompanying illustration. Shushruth 16:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Info- i was out for the weekend and couldnt do this before, but here it is. i removed the cartilage and extended the rips lines, even when i am not really happy with it crossing the other lines , it now points the first and the last rip -LadyofHats 10:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support - Good work - Alvesgaspar 07:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
