Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Grus antigone Luc viatour.jpg

Image:Grus antigone Luc viatour.jpg, featured

•  Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by --Luc Viatour 09:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Luc Viatour 09:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Nice detail. Too bad that the part of the head facing the camera is in the shadow. --Dschwen 09:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, I sent a new upload corrected version --Luc Viatour 10:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
    • No, sorry, but the only difference I see less sharpening. --Dschwen 12:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
      • And now third version? --Luc Viatour 13:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nature photography is not Hollywood, the moment counts --Makro Freak 13:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Uhm, yeah, but this is not exactly a unique key moment. Plus people seem to forget that an oppose on FPC doesn't mean the picture is crap, but merely that is is not one of the very best pictures. Shure not every nature pic has to be perfect, but this is not about nature pictures, it is about featured pictures! --Dschwen 14:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
    • ... absolutely agree with you and welcome the exciting procedure to find out which is a FP or not. I like to read all the different opinions of the voters which sometimes makes me laughing or contemplative. Spoken for me, is that this pictures are donations and formerly used for describing things in Wikipedia. If a writer is searching for photographic content he will be very happy if he can find a detailed, crispy and enlightend picture like this. Surely it will be great if the bird will raise his head, doing some never seen before emotions but for a Taxo picture as a example this is great. You are a (really good :) ) photographer but your opinion differs a lot from a writer. Maybe iam wrong because of beeing new to Wikimedia, but for me Wikimedia isnt Tony Stone, thats why i like it. --Makro Freak 16:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Winiar^✉ 19:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - I agree it would better with a more favourable lighting but the picture is still very good, the detail in the head is not afected Alvesgaspar 22:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see what the fuss is about. Looks really nice to me, ack Makro Freak. -- Ram-Man 04:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 09:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Moreover i found out that many pictures by luc are taken with backlight, so i would say its his style --Makro Freak 10:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great detail --Tony Wills 12:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Orchi 19:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 21:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)