Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Freudenberg sg Switzerland.jpg

Image:Freudenberg sg Switzerland.jpg

Edit 1 Edit 2

•  Info created by Christoph Michels - uploaded by Christoph Michels - nominated by Christoph Michels --Christoph Michels 07:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Left Version (Original), featured

•  Support --Christoph Michels 07:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC) I agree that the edited version is better.
•  Support Great mood, lovely pastel colors just not tack sharp MichaD 07:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment - This is one of the most beatifull pictures nominated as FPC in the last times. Still, strict photographic quality is not very good: the picture is blurry and lacks detail, and the colouring doesn't look natural. Before I vote I would like to know if the image was post-processed and how. Alvesgaspar 08:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I corrected the tilt. Otherwise there was no post-processing at all. Would you recommend changing anything with the colors? The picture was taken in the very late afternoon when the light is dim but very warm.--Christoph Michels 08:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - I just wanted to know... Alvesgaspar 11:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is pretty because of the colors, but there are no fine details. The hillside grass is just color mush. Maybe this is blur, not enough DoF, or a combination of both. It's possible that the focus is set too far into infinity. There is no mitigating reason why a smaller aperture couldn't have been used. -- Ram-Man 12:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral I love the colours and the atmosphere. But I agree with Ram-Man about the aperture issue. Also i dont like the horizon centered in the middle of the picture. That divides the picture in two parts. --Simonizer 12:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I like the mood. In my opinion the so called color mush is resulted in the dim light and the little color contrast. --LC-de 12:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • An image in twilight like this should have a relatively sharp foreground, like this image taken at the same time as this sunset. Taking it in dim light is no excuse for this much unsharpness. Approximately 50% of the image is blurred. At 1/800 and f/5.6, there was no reason this image couldn't have been taken at 1/400 and f/11. -- Ram-Man 13:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hardly any details. --Digon3 15:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Malene Thyssen 18:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurry Tbc 19:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose a very nice composition, quite blurry. The colour temperature is exaggeratedly warm --Ikiwaner 19:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 20:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - blurr doesn`t matter - it is a great composition--Danielaheyland 20:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Makro Freak 07:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Atoma 09:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support pleasant looking --LucaG 21:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I just love my nation's landscapes Booksworm 15:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Overlord 22:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sky has some good, subtle colours, but the large expanse of rather boring and unfocussed green on the left detracts from the composition. --MichaelMaggs 09:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T 10:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - the picture is a very nice harmonious whole --Ninov 13:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - great atmosphere Jón 22:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Arad 23:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Since the other version is better.

result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => featured Simonizer 07:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Center Version, not featured

•  Info - Sharpened and noise reduced.
•  Support --Arad 23:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Christoph Michels 09:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 12:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Right Version, not featured

•  Info - Sharpened and noise reduced and color temperature cooled down. Maybe it kills the mood and atmosphere. But let the majority decide.
•  Support --Arad 23:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 12:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)