Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Feeding a Bearded Dragon.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Feeding a Bearded Dragon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Feeding a bearded dragon
  •  Nominate
norro 13:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Support norro 13:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Neutral disgusting but informative, somewhat funny. The Dragon should be in a natural environment. -PedroPVZ 15:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • The dragon usually does not sit on the blue sofa, but this was the only way to keep the grasshopper from hiding behind plants and stones and so on. He probably does not like to get eaten. -- aka 16:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • ok. but in the middle of the grass and a stone near it... would be perfect.--PedroPVZ 19:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - no photo of the actual catch, not in natural environment - Rex
  •  Support very cool--Pjotr 17:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sequence should be presented as 6 individual pictures, and stuck together with a table. Aren't the originals more than 325 pixels wide? dbenbenn | talk 19:04, 24 June 2005
  •  Oppose. That lizard is sooo cute, but I'll oppose these pics on the sofa. --Erin (talk) 20:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Support LoopZilla 21:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Get_It 22:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  •  Support - doch, auch wenn der Grashüpfer das nicht gerne mochte ;-) -- Farbenfreude 29 June 2005 22:23 (UTC)
  •  Support -- I really like this. It perfectly illustrates not a bearded dragon but a bearded dragon feeding. I especially like his cheerful smile at the end. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:53 (UTC)
  •  Support; the last panel really sells this one. :) -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:47 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice last panel! --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:09 (UTC)
  •  Support - Didactohedron 16:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose -- I like it, but I think the blue is overwelming -- Joolz 18:21, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - could possibly be improved by changing background color.--Eloquence 22:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 01:29, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]