Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2011 at 20:30:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Hendric Stattmann - uploaded by Hendric Stattmann - nominated by Hendric Stattmann -- Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain As the creator. -- Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Update 2011-05-31. Due to an unforeseen event (my twins were born 10 weeks early just now), I have tocount on the community to edit the image for better noise / tones, so the criticism can be addressed. Please find the CR2 file at [1]. It is available under the same license as the jpg. Thank you very much for your understanding and support. With regards, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Update 2011-06-01: Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC) I hereby withdraw the candidature. There is a consensus that the image could have the potential to be acceptable as featured image, but it also requires significant amount of post-processing (noise control, tone mapping, contrast, etc.) in order to satisfy the requirements. For the reason mentioned above, I am currently not in a position to execute the necessary improvements. With kind regards, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Update 2011-06-01: I have listed the picture in the Graphic Lab. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I wanted to support, but in full resolution it is quite noisy. --Tomer T (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have worked on the noise and uploaded a new version. For your consideration. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral Per TT, but I don't think it is bad enough to oppose. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have worked on the noise and uploaded a new version. For your consideration. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- A very nice image with a good composition, but it need also a tonemapping correction! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat and image quality is suboptimal. I do agree with some post-processing this image could be considerably improved to be FP. --Murdockcrc (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)