Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cascata caracol2.jpg

Image:Cascata caracol2.jpg - featured

previous version (not for vote)

•  Nominate

— This is an edited version of previously nomination here, nomination was rejected primarily for birgthness and contrast.  The image was adjusted increase 20% contrast , reduction of brightness 15% Gnangarra 16:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

•  Support — Gnangarra 16:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support, a little washed-out looking in the centre but not enough to stop me supporting. Thryduulf 17:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Richardfabi 00:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -Quasipalm 03:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - I prefer the top picture. // Liftarn 10:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral great scenery, but partly overexposed (especially the falling water, but also the rocks) as can be seen in full resolution MGo 06:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Has some flaws at full resolution, and composition was boring before and its still boring now. Francisco M. Marzoa 16:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF 23:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like to top photo more. -- Lerdsuwa 15:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Zimbres 00:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support historicair 12:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Please put your votes into the appropriate sub-chapter! Roger McLassus 18:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
  •  Comment image on the left is the nominated image the one on the right had previoucly been nominated but failed due to birghtness levels. Gnangarra 02:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information Roger McLassus 09:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support. El Comandante 00:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral --> Featured Roger McLassus 07:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)