Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bytom - Detal architektoniczny kamienicy - Twarz.jpg

Image:Bytom - Detal architektoniczny kamienicy - Twarz.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Lestat --Lestat 16:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lestat 16:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Romary 22:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Diligent 18:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--WarX 19:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC) It has something
•  Support Herr Kriss 22:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Szczepan dyskusja Mail 22:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Karelj 22:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Olegivvit 12:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Please give a reason. Opposing without a reason is not very polite. Thanks! --Simonizer 14:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support MesserWoland Dyskusja 14:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose unattractive with bird droppings (?). Lycaon 21:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment probably it's air pollution degradating sandstone. It's very large problem in Silesia :(--WarX 21:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's minimally tilted (-.5?), and maybe two or three more pixel at the bottom would have benefitted it... but I don't see bird droppings or polution as major reasons for rejecting pictures of open-air architecture. --Ibn Battuta 22:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - it's alright, but doesn't have the 'Wow!' necessary for featuring - MPF 00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Disagree - it has large amount of this Wow ;)--WarX 11:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment And today's gull photo has Wow! factor? ;) --Leafnode 11:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Hell yeah! The gull photo has billion times more WOW factor. --Arad 01:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

•  SupportHarald23 11:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Krzysiu Jarzyna ☎ 11:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Leafnode 11:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Wow. Where all the polish voters are surprisingly come from? ;-) ;-) ;-) --Simonizer 12:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment From the Offical Polish Cabal Project --WarX 13:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Nolanus 18:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Nice original picture
•  Oppose I don't like the B&W --Digon3 19:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose not so special. --Tone 20:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality picture, not relevant subject. - Alvesgaspar 21:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not FP for sure. There is no WOW factor and the quality is mediocore. --Arad 01:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Emotionally stirring; enhanced by "blemishes" of environment and time. Jeremy Tobacman 09:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ack MPF. --MichaelMaggs 09:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Urban 05:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. /Daniel78 12:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good lighting, nice patina, well captured architectural detail. Using b/w for this makes perfect sense. ~ trialsanderrors 20:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

result: 14 support, 11 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 00:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)