Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bejsce church 20060624 1321.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Bejsce church 20060624 1321.jpg - not featured[edit]

Saint Nicholas Church

  •  Info created by Jakub Hałun - uploaded by Jakub Hałun - nominated by Charlessauer --Charlessauer 03:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Charlessauer 03:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry but I can't see any wow factor here. --MichaelMaggs 06:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - Bad lighting (subject too dark), uncorrected geometric distortion (vertical lines not parallel) - Alvesgaspar 09:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose. Not to pile on, but just to make some suggestions. The fence is distracting, it either should have been in or out of the photo, but not half in and half out. The roof line gets lost in the light. The photo appears to have been taken with the camera pointing up to fit the whole church in? The problem with doing that is that it makes the left side of the church appear to lean right, and the right side appears to lean left. And there's something happening in the door of the church, but it's hard to see what because of the light. Lastly, the shadow on half of the roof and front of the church is unfortunate, it makes part of it too dark, while leaving part of it too light. Regards, Ben Aveling 11:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC). PS. Some of your own contributions look nice, but they would be much more useful if you put them in categories. Otherwise no-one will ever find them, even if they go looking for them.[reply]
  •  Oppose as Alvesgaspar --Karelj 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • [This is not a criticism it is just a comment]: I suppose you would prefer Alexander Pope to e.e. cummings, too. I think this photo is far better than the image above or below it... But, that is just my opinion. Charlessauer 00:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  • Perspective. If all images are corrected to have parallel and perpendicular lines, they start to have a medieval appearance. I like a little perspective.Charlessauer 00:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
    • Not all photographs are taken at noon on a safari. Some photographs are taken at dusk, dawn, or at night. Correcting the lighting to make it look like it was taken at a different time takes some of the appeal away. The high contrast in this picture is appealing. It emphasizes the building's structure. Charlessauer 00:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  •  Oppose This image is good, but just not quite good enough for a FP. The fence issue is important and I don't like how the left tree obscures the roof. I think if this image was taken a bit farther to the right and either closer or farther away it would have been better. I think the lighting is fine. -- Ram-Man 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 1 support, 5 oppose >> not featured (rule of the 5th day) - Alvesgaspar 20:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Bejsce_church_20060624_1321.jpg&oldid=5840348"