Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bald Eagle, Kodiak, Alaska.jpg

Info created by Mary Lynn Stephenson - uploaded by Rlevse - nominated by Rlevse -- — Rlevse • Talk • 03:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Rlevse • Talk • 03:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition --che 04:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Even though this is not an animal especially easy to photograph, I still feel that the composition is substandard. It would have been much better if the eagle could fill more of the frame. How far away were you from the bird? Freedom to share 07:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, I just nom'd it, I was not the photographer and she doesn't have an account. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the nom of this initial image, but keep the retouched one nom'd. User:Rlevse 00:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you like this retouched version more? --Plenz 22:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it slightly more, but it doesn't fulfil size requirements (2 MPix minimum) 1200px*1600px = 1920000px, 80000 pixels short. Sorry, Freedom to share 22:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Size corrected --Freedom to share 15:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you include more of the background and get the size requirement up? — Rlevse • Talk • 02:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I don't have to understand how a picture gets "better" by adding some "rubbish" :) but here it is. --Plenz 08:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like the way it stands out from the misty background. --MichaelMaggs 13:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is even better and naturally I support it too. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, meets the general standards expected of featured media, is a great improvement on the original version, and overall does the project justice. I'm proud to slap my support on it, with the hope others will too. Anthøny 02:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see a lot of noise in the background and on the dark parts of he bird. Estrilda 11:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sharpness

Support, meets the general standards expected of featured media and is a great improvement on the original version. Evrik 22:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 11:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support — the cropped version is much improved; I like the DOF in this. ERcheck 15:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is nice. Unfortune lacking of lighting and details. Heavy ammount of noise --Richard Bartz 12:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photo is better than before. miranda 00:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu