Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Auchenorrhyncha Anaglyph.jpg

Just a comparison of sizes, not for vote :-)

Info created, uploaded & nominated by -- Richard Bartz 15:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info You need an Anaglyph (3-D glasses) to view this image
Info The result of a stack of 172 images to expand the dof (to bring out the tiniest details).
Support Very hard work. Can it match with bad copyvio Nicole Kidman, which has faded away ? :-)) -- Richard Bartz 15:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 15:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Am I the only one who does not own Anaglyphs? I think it could be of relevance to provide also a 2D version for us pour Anaglyph-depleted souls. As I understand the process you really combine two images (or selected colour layers thereof) (each of which must have been generated from 86(?) images to get a good DOF). Could we see one of the two DOF-deep images? (And if I have misunderstood everything, just ignore my question). I'd really like to see it as it seems you have pushed your equipment to the max here. -- Slaunger 21:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anaglyph owners should have a entitlement to a reward, so you have to settle for the size comparision picture in 2d ;-) --Richard Bartz 21:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dang. I will put it on my wishlist for my birthday. Only eight more months....can hardly wait. As a matter of fact I like the 2D comparison image a lot. Only a pity the resolution is not higher. It is really amusing to look at the interplay between the insect and the stitch. -- Slaunger 21:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Amazing! -- MJJR 20:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question What software did you use to combine the images? --MichaelMaggs 08:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photoshop for 3d. Helicon Focus for DoF --Richard Bartz 11:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll have a look at Helicon Focus. Anyway,

Support Some more solid performance. Freedom to share 15:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Moscvitch 17:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yet another great work by Richard. One of the best things of your work is how colors are preserved; I only get b&w images working, I mean like this - Keta 17:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thermos 03:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

8 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 23:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu