Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Argynnis paphia 3 Richard Bartz.jpg

Info created & nominated by --Richard Bartz 10:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 10:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support much better without the bright parts on the right --Simonizer 10:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aber das Lichtspiel war doch so schön :-) --Richard Bartz 11:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support, I must say I liked the original better, but this is good enough too. --Aqwis 11:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 12:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The landscape version was great already. This one is better because it's more suitable for an encyclopaedic article.
Question What flower is that? (Add this to the description.) Where was the photo taken? (Add coordinates.) --TM 13:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support as former version --B.navez 13:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support RedCoat 14:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wisnia6522 16:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also like this one, although the landscape version has such a nice bokeh on the right side... Chmehl 17:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean bokeh as in the Japanese ぼけ（bokeh）? I think the bokeh is just like this one. I have left the landscape version like as Photoshop's Copy Stamp Tool then I opposed that one. -- Laitche 19:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu