Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zygaena filipendulae 03.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Zygaena filipendulae 03.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2010 at 14:43:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Bjoertvedt - uploaded by Bjoertvedt - nominated by Bjoertvedt -- Bjoertvedt (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Bjoertvedt (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the beetles are out of focus, and the macro bar is very high. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- What is a "macro bar"? Bjoertvedt (talk) 07:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- That is the level of exigence for macrophotography. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Which means what? ;-) 83.109.105.198 16:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- What they are trying to say is that we already have many very very very good photographs of insects featured, and thus new insects have to be at least as good as those we have already featured. Thus even a single defect may be sufficient to reject an image. --99of9 (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- ...In other words most users here expect very, very, very high quality, as in large, very sharp/properly stacked, no over or underexposure, nothing cut out, a good amount of space around the subject, good framing and interesting composition.. No way of being too critical when discerning if a bug photo you took is good enough to pass here. --IdLoveOne (talk) 23:54, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- What they are trying to say is that we already have many very very very good photographs of insects featured, and thus new insects have to be at least as good as those we have already featured. Thus even a single defect may be sufficient to reject an image. --99of9 (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- What is a "macro bar"? Bjoertvedt (talk) 07:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
- Wow, HighFinSpermWhale! Is that good custom to vote against featuring - as the only person - and than present the result yourself as "rejected"? I know quiet a few Wikis where that would have got you into some real deep water, to say it the least... Wondering, Bjoertvedt (talk) 01:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry Bjoertvedt, HighFin has done the right thing. If after 5 days of nomination there are no support votes other than the nominator, the nomination is declined. This template is the outcome. --99of9 (talk) 03:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
