Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zrenjanin, Svetozara Markovića, starý dům.jpg

File:Zrenjanin, Svetozara Markovića, starý dům.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2011 at 20:12:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zrenjanin, Svetozara Markovića, starý dům.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zrenjanin, Svetozara Markovića, starý dům.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aktron -- Aktron (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Aktron (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good. --Mile (talk) 09:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment What is so great about a flaked wall? --Snaevar (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

   Info Composition, colors, spirit of old/abandoned...if You get this kind of fotos. Some dont, some do.--Mile (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overexposed or a shadow at the door to the right, should be taken at a different time of day, IMO.--Snaevar (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
  • You mean underexsposed part ? Well, its shadow, no harm, wouldnt call it underexsposing. --Mile (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support look impressive -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality could be better, seems a bit unsharp. I have no problem with featuring things people might just think of as common like a door, but I wish this were less fuzzy for FP. The composition is good, but maybe QI? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can not orientate my way around. It should have an occompanying picture showing the whole building. I do not immediately see high educational value and no importance or historic significance is indicated in the file documentation. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

   Info Well it documents architecture in a larger city in serbian Banate, especially from the closer point of view. Yes, it might seem a bit flicker-y, but I can imagine Wikipedia or WMC projects' pages where such a picture would be well used. --Aktron (talk) 15:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)