Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yangshupu Power Plant at sunset.JPG

File:Yangshupu Power Plant at sunset.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2014 at 04:38:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Yangshupu Power Plant at sunset.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yangshupu Power Plant at sunset.JPG

•  Info A photograph depicting the layout of Yangshupu Power Plant during sunset which is a power station shut in 2010 for carbon dioxide reduction. The plant will have a transformation to an exhibition facility showing the native culture of Shanghai. Photo was taken on Ferry Line Jinqiao Rd. to Dinghai Rd., Shanghai, China. (translated by Eland Zhou)
  created by 我爱波音哈 - uploaded by 我爱波音哈 - nominated by 我爱波音哈 -- 我爱波音哈 (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- 我爱波音哈 (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Fayhoo (talk) 05:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support：The picture gathered the beautiful scenery of sunset and the lost factory together, inspires infinity imagination.--Pumpkin (talk) 14:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits --A.Savin 15:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support：good light balance -- Galaxyharrylion (User talk:Galaxyharrylion) 05:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice sunset but nothing extraordinary, poor quality at 100% view, please stop the meatpuppetry --A.Savin 15:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
• I suddenly feel compelled as if by voodoo to vote  Support -- Penyulap ☏ 16:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin, sunset silouettes are nice, but I see no reason why this should be FP, especially as it's very ordinary technically --DXR (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Featured pictures need to be technically complicated now ?? when did this happen !!! Penyulap ☏ 21:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

I apologize that my wording might have been ambiguous, I meant mediocre (or just call it insufficient, if you like). IMO the technical guidelines are clear enough, and this image has obvious denoise artifacts (look at the bridge, extremely soft, clear loss of details) and this is not good enough for a FP in my opinion.--DXR (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Well, he'll just have to find a powerplant at sunset that's built in a completely pollution-free city next time (?!?!) but seriously, this cannot be anywhere BUT a city with bad air pollution, which invariably is going to appear the same as noise. I can't think of how else digital cameras can present smog to the viewer. Never mind, often I see people pick out the smallest grains of dust like they were specks of gold in a prospectors pan. Penyulap ☏ 05:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support：Coolmanjackey (talk) 01:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. Kruusamägi (talk) 03:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. --P e z i (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. -- Colin (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 06:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)