Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weert Martinuskerk gewelf.jpg

File:Weert Martinuskerk gewelf.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2010 at 21:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Weert Martinuskerk gewelf.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weert Martinuskerk gewelf.jpg

•  Info created by Jan van den Eijnden - uploaded by Jan van den Eijnden - nominated by Basvb -- Basvb (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
• Maybe it even looks better when it's turned around 180 degrees. I love the way this vaults blow you away and all the details -- Basvb (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I concur with nominator, except for turning it 180 degrees. But was this taken in the night? Why the 25 second exposure at f/5.6? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't knwo why it had a 25 second exposure, maybe just because the church was a bit dark? Based on the other photo's taken in and around the church I think the picture was taken during the day. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 08:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Gorgeous ! --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful --Llez (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Stunningly beautiful. TFCforever (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Fine work --Schnobby (talk) 07:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! - Quistnix (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I am missing seeing this image as FP because of composition.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Question -- What do you mean with "composition"? This is a perfect symmetric composition of a perfect symmetric construction. What is the alternative?-- --Frode Inge Helland (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

The hanging lights aren't perfectly on the picture, sadly. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose -- No wow factor. Colors weak. Mulazimoglu (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Question --Weak colors? Have you ever been in a real gothic cathedral?-- --Frode Inge Helland (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Kooritza (talk) 05:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lots of wow, delicate colours and amazing composition. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Kooritza (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC) I understand your enthusiasm, but it appears that you voted two times. I cancel your last vote (don't worry, It happens to me too...)--Jebulon (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture