Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vor Frelsers Kirke (Kopenhagen) – 360° panorama from the top.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Vor Frelsers Kirke (Kopenhagen) – 360° panorama from the top.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2019 at 05:41:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Denmark
- Info created by Maximilian Schönherr - uploaded by Maximilian Schönherr - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question - Where's the link to the pano viewer? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question Can you please add the link to Pano viewer and geo code into the picture? Also, it'd be great if you add more categories. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Thanks. I'm sorry, but I'm not impressed with the quality. The sky is quite noisy and some areas are blurred. I really don't think this is one of the best panoramas we've seen at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a very interesting place that you took the panorama from. But I have to agree with Ikan. Quality of your other nomination is much better. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I'm afraid I agree, it's a nice view but in terms of resolution and quality it doesn't meet our best 360-degree panoramas. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- hello folks, the church tower and my humble self feel honoured about the nomination. however, i’m Oppose not keen on pic of the day. the resolution discussion reminds me of my beginnings as a professional photographer. stock photo platforms did not honour the content, but the quality. that’s why i photograph for pictureAlliance and wikiCommons now. the flickr import function in the commons points to content, not resolution. you cannot do the 360° photo with a DSLR. the theta has flaws like chromatic abberation. pls keep this in mind for your future discussions about remarkable images. i don’t follow the wiki main pages —the images i see there are technically excellent but lacking the thrill. know what i mean? Maximilian (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Your picture is not lacking the thrill - I like it! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --BoothSift 23:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: The original author has opposed it, so...--BoothSift 23:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Confirmed results: