Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volcanic Ash Dunes.jpg

File:Volcanic Ash Dunes.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2009 at 15:00:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Volcanic Ash Dunes.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volcanic Ash Dunes.jpg

•  Info created by Flick user tarotastic - uploaded by Mifter - nominated by Mifter -- Mifter (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mifter (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture! --Phyrexian (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, the overexposed sky is unfortunate, but this is a good picture regardless. --Aqwis (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very good -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lovely composition, but poor quality. —kallerna™ 16:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I do not see the categories, and where is the place.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support despite some fairly minor issues. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I enjoy the composition and the perspective. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 03:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose underexposure not forgivable given the amount of other high quality images of the same subject. --ianaré (talk) 05:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Not underexposed at all (check image histogram), there is about 1.4% of pixels over exposed (clouds/sky). I think the steam and ash in the air makes it looks as though the image quality isn't as good as it really is :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment What other high quality images of this subject are their on Commons? When I was looking around prior to nominating this for FP, I was unable to find any similar images. Best, Mifter (talk) 23:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

• I just looked in the category. I think File:Tavurvur volcano 5.jpg and File:Tavurvur volcano 1.jpg are better. --ianaré (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose As ianaré. Expositon parameters. --Karel (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a real pity, but from the technical point of view I have to agree with kallerna. --NEURO ^⇌ 21:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality, seem to be a lot of noise and lack of detail. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice res and angle. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Tony Wills (talk) 00:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Since it looks like it will get promoted: Could you fix the tilted horizon? --NEURO ^⇌ 05:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 09:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 22:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena