Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista panorámica de Peñíscola desde el castillo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Vista panorámica de Peñíscola desde el castillo.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2009 at 12:18:28
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Rastrojo - uploaded by Rastrojo - nominated by Rastrojo -- Rastrojo (D•ES) 12:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Rastrojo (D•ES) 12:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)- Support Interesting place.--Two+two=4 (talk) 14:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Conditional oppose Very nice stitch job. (How many images do you have there and which SW did you use to stitch it?). Good light and very detailed and sharp. Very pleasant to look at and quite impressive. I am very close at supporting, but the the view, light and composition is not quite as breathtaking as in most FP panoramas in my opinion. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 18:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh my, Dschwen is right. You have by the way also a stitching error on the roof of the buiding where there are the big letters "Peniscula". I've changed my vote to a conditional oppose. Will change it back to neutral if and when the tilt mentioned by Dschwen and the stitching error is addressed. --Slaunger (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Where do you see the stitching error? :S Rastrojo (D•ES) 10:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Don't you see the building with the huge red on white Peniscula letter in front of it, on the pier/mole going out to the left and up in the photo? Or can't you see the stitching error on the roof of that building? --Slaunger (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Where do you see the stitching error? :S Rastrojo (D•ES) 10:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh my, Dschwen is right. You have by the way also a stitching error on the roof of the buiding where there are the big letters "Peniscula". I've changed my vote to a conditional oppose. Will change it back to neutral if and when the tilt mentioned by Dschwen and the stitching error is addressed. --Slaunger (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I find neither the building nor the stitching error :S Rastrojo (D•ES) 11:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have marked the problem area with an annotation on the file page. This will be a very handy FPC tool when enabled by default by a gadget shortly. --Slaunger (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, there's no stitching error: here's a part of the image. Regards. Rastrojo (D•ES) 16:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for showing me one of the images. It does indeed confirm that there is a stitching error along one of the sides of the roof visible as a nudge/dislocation/small step along the edge to the back - a step which is clearly not present in the original. As if the two photos in the seem are offset by a pixel or two. Do you want me to upload a derivative work where it is explicitly highlighted with a little red circle around the problem area? It is not a big thing, but it should be easy to fix. --Slaunger (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for showing this image, Rastrojo, because there is a misalignment visible indeed. Where? Between the brown sand beach and the harbour basin there is a double decker coach on the parking lot. And then look to the left of the bus and trace the alignment of the roof edges. Compare stitch with your original photo. Why and how? Depending on your alignment method in hugin, first make sure you have enough good control points and taken away bad ones. Then from the drop-down menu (use other alignment options first) choose "Everything" and look whether the alignment has improved. -- Klaus with K (talk) 17:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, there's no stitching error: here's a part of the image. Regards. Rastrojo (D•ES) 16:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have marked the problem area with an annotation on the file page. This will be a very handy FPC tool when enabled by default by a gadget shortly. --Slaunger (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I made it with 7-8 photographs. I used Hugin :) Rastrojo (D•ES) 18:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Rastrojo, you need to use vertical guides in Hugin. The buildings are leaning all over the place, and the horizon bends up towards the right as a result. This can be easily avoided. --Dschwen (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment I've moved Slaunger's image note from the file page to this very page. If you don't see an image note on the image above, reload your browser's cache! Lupo 08:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you Lupo. It works like a charm from my IE/XP. And I was positively surprised that the annotations can also be seen from the list (although, when thinking about that it is transcluded onto the list it is perhaps not so surprising). --Slaunger (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- That was actually the hard part. The easy part was making it work here. Lupo 10:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you Lupo. It works like a charm from my IE/XP. And I was positively surprised that the annotations can also be seen from the list (although, when thinking about that it is transcluded onto the list it is perhaps not so surprising). --Slaunger (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Can you upload the original images, so eventual "experts" can try restitch? →AzaToth 14:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll upload them tomorrow. Rastrojo (D•ES) 21:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
