Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama.jpg

File:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2009 at 13:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama.jpg

•  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 13:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 13:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Anything could be done to bring up the color saturation a bit (sky, foliage) without bringing quality down? Mid-day shots bring hard light on scenery.--S23678 (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Do you mean to change the color of the sky without changing the color of the hills? One should also remember that so-called "mid-day" shot in November are very different from "mid-day" shot in June. The sun never goes high up in mid November (of course I mean Northern Hemisphere :))--Mbz1 (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support, please don't alter the colours. --Aqwis (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that the hard light generates some white spots in the foliage which make it appear less colorful when seen in smaller sizes. Yet, when seen in full resolution, the picture appears saturated enough and seems realistic (well, i've never been there, otoh. ) So, I support this version and I'm not convinced it'd benefit from an increased saturation. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC) (edit conflict with Aqwis, with whom I agree).
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Admirable --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support – Hooray, the colors work this time! Nicely done. How about putting scrollbar around the image? I guess not every screen is 1881 px wide ... --Ernie (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Infofile:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama - levels edit.jpg This is not an alternative version open for voting.
•  Comment This is a quick edit about possible modifications. The entire image was darken a bit, then the sky alone got it's levels adjusted (darker, again). As you see the sky quality is now terrible from posterization, but such problems should not be visible if done from original RAW images. --S23678 (talk) 01:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• I think your edit is a bit too saturated – especially the sky. --Ernie (talk) 07:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
• I believe that darkening the land part of the picture makes it appear less sun-drenched and thus less compelling. As for the sky, well... I truly prefer the "natural" version over this one, per Ernie. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Diti the penguin — 08:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very good quality and high resolution. -- JovanCormac 10:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support with both hands up - great! --Leafnode✉ 16:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support the current version 99of9 (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support knapp, aber ok. --High Contrast (talk) 11:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. --Silversmith Hewwo 22:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - One of your best, nice work! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Avala (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow²! Jacopo Werther (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas