Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Veluwse Papiermolen in het Openluchtmuseum van Arnhem.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Veluwse Papiermolen in het Openluchtmuseum van Arnhem.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 22:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by [[User:Uberprutser}|]] -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Some time ago I tried to get this version featured but unfortunately a lot of people disliked the cut of reflection. So is this one better? --Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)- Support -- Haven't looked at the original, but this is absolutely beautiful. High, high praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nice comp but looks definitely overexposed to me (right side of building). Top/bottom crop very tight while too much empty space on the right, maybe portrait orientation or square framing would have done better. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)- Comment You say nice comp but then start to complain about empty space and a tight crop, aren't those mutually exclusive? If I had under exposed the image chances are you would complain about noise in the shadow areas. Your own eyes would have had a hard time seeing some details on the right side of the building. So a view overexposed patches seem rather natural to me. Sigh. --Uberprutser (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition not really working for me, and I agree it is overexposed (bright sunlight in woodland is especially hard). There's too much side and not enough waterwheel. -- Colin (talk) 11:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a bit overexposed, but I like it --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support I like it, but I prefer the alternative. --Baykedevries (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose It's quite hard to read due to the complex shadows, and in such a case, I'd prefer not to also have a reflection with almost the same amount of definition and contrast. The overexposure is also quite noticeable. I think this shot would be far easier to get right in less sunny conditions. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 12:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Alternative:
Confirmed results:
