Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vase on the terrace of Grand Peterhof Palace.jpg

File:Vase on the terrace of Grand Peterhof Palace.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2012 at 14:35:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vase on the terrace of Grand Peterhof Palace.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vase on the terrace of Grand Peterhof Palace.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Florstein, nominated by A.Savin 14:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support - A.Savin 14:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome colors --Martin Kraft (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- JDP90 (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 23:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition --The Photographer (talk) 02:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC) I changed my mind per Tomas and Benh. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose This picture really is not about the vase, but of everything. The depth of field is too great creating an everything in focus effect, visually distracting. The proportion of vase/surroundings does not appeal to me, and centered composition of main subject, the lighting is flat. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Trivial centered composition, oversaturated and globally overprocessed (I suspect the clarity trigger in Lightroom was pushed a bit too far). Par Tomas for depth of field issue. Obviously author wanted focus on vase, but choice of wide angle yields busy background. - Benh (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the lesson. :) --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
    • I prefer calling it opinion :) I hope it didn't sound like I was looking down on you. - Benh (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
      • No-no, it's okay. I'm upset a bit by those who dont have his own opinion. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh. --Citron (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh. --Böhringer (talk) 11:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh. --Banangraut (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Do you have your own brain, or all of you use the Benh's one? Just interested. ;) --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

• It is pure humbleness to appreciate a good review than to try to say something new/unimportant and pretend that we too are good reviewers. :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

• Oh, thanks for explanation. I'm simply a neophyte in this section of WM and dont understand something yet. But anyway - it's not very good that you've changed your opinion post factum... I think. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

• Not so good; but sometimes we have to reconsider our opinions, considering the wise. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I like everything in focus. It would just be a meaningless object without the context. Although I think the composition could have been decentered a little for a nice 2/3 ratio, but it still looks good. In fact the only reason I forgive the composition is BECAUSE everything is in focus. Badon (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support It would be boring as a standalone object. The context adds a lot of value. Yann (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose A bit oversaturated, also in my humble opinion the DoF is either too short or too long. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not clear what the main object is. Oversaturated. -- -donald- (talk) 07:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I also like pictures where it is not clear what the main object is. So for this one, it is all about taste: composition, color intensity, whatever... i like it! --Taraxacum (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)