Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vangendthallen-binnen.jpg

File:Vangendthallen-binnen.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2010 at 16:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vangendthallen-binnen.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vangendthallen-binnen.jpg

•  Info created by Apus apus - uploaded by Apus apus - nominated by Basvb -- Basvb (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - This picture ended 3th in the Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest in which 12.500 picture of dutch rijksmonuments contested. The picture ended this high because of questions, like how can a plant grow here? what was this hall used for with all that graffity, or how long is it in it's current use?, and with that the story it tells. Sorry for my english, if anything is unclair please ask. Basvb (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Sadece ilginç ancak seçkin resim özelliklerine sahip değil. Mulazimoglu (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't really understand what google translate says, but you mean that there is not really a subject in the picture? The subject is the nl:Hallen van Stork (a part of a former train and ship engine factory in Amsterdam). Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I mean something like interesting but dont have criters of a featured picture. Mulazimoglu (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose It is a fun picture with the plant growing, but I also find it confusing. It is as if the photo has several different objectives. To show a plant growing indoors, to show an exhibition and a building inside. This is too much to try and do in one photo IMO. Moreover, the image quality is not on par with what is normally promoted. For instance noise and colors are not too good. --Slaunger (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per other opponents.--Jebulon (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Weak support Somewhat tilted, IMO, but I love the picture otherwise. –hoverFly | chat? 17:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Magistral composition. Art showing art being shown. light can be better. Tanakashi (talk) Puppet. Yann (talk) 11:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting composition - totally nonconformistic :-D That's a good value not common for most pictures here on WMC. --Aktron (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I love it! --Kirua (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like it, but agree with Slaunger. --Avenue (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very serious chromatic aberrations on the upper beams. --99of9 (talk) 12:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)