Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valerie Aurora headshot.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Valerie Aurora headshot.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 07:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info uploaded by SarahStierch - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Oppose for a studio headshot, the DOF isn't very convincing. Portrait quality isn't at FP-level. If my hair were that color, I'd dye it. Kleuske (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)- Info uploaded an edited version to clean that awful banded background in the original file. Sting (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support --The edited version with a much less banded background. I like this portrait with a nice technical quality. I disagree with you Kleuske as for me the DOF is well set to concentrate on what's important, catching the viewer's sight on the face. As a counter-example, the following portrait doesn't work for me because of the out-of-focus lips and eyebrow. Sting (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support DOF is enough for me for a portrait; we can hide a lot of ugliness in our face by shallow DOF. JKadavoor Jee 05:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
